Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coordinated omission in latency benchmarks #128

Open
buybackoff opened this issue Feb 21, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Coordinated omission in latency benchmarks #128

buybackoff opened this issue Feb 21, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@buybackoff
Copy link
Member

buybackoff commented Feb 21, 2018

An eye-opening talk by Gil Tene. We already use HDR Histogram but need to make sure GC doesn't pauses result collection. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpBwt-rO07o

One idea is to use Spreads.IPC/Aeron to write and read values into a IPC channel and then process them on Spreads side. Then we will measure correct response time. Run an elevated GC-free proc with a precise timer (e.g. volatile incrementing long counter or performance counter) in a separate thread. That would be a realistic test for data arriving -> processed -> returned.

Good news is that most focus so far was on throughput, latency percentiles were just to understand orders of magnitude.

Upd. Same talk, another version: https://www.infoq.com/presentations/latency-response-time

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant